The Problem With Labels
PeopleMaps was designed to deliberately avoid the use of labels. Labelling would make life easier for PeopleMaps, however, they have inherent problems, which is why the decision was taken not to use them.
Labels Are Pejorative
No one likes to be pigeonholed or stereotyped.
Labels are rarely neutral, meaning that an individual will have a preference for some labels and an aversion to others. This affects the results and usefulness of a system.
Labels Encourage Gross Oversimplification
The complexity of human personality cannot be reduced into a single word, phrase or letters, this would be a gross oversimplification. Personality profiles are designed to enable an understanding of a personality. Oversimplifying will not provide sufficient understanding.
We must never forget that every human is unique. When labels are used, the idea of uniqueness is lost.
Labels Require Interpretation
All labels require interpretation and this causes variations that can distort because they expose the vagaries of that interpretation. Two people may give very different interpretations for any given label.
Once interpretation is needed, training to conduct the interpretation will be required. The quality of both training and students add further factors/detractors to the accuracy of the system. These vagaries increase the error margin, which means that for some, the accuracy of the system will be significantly compromised.
Effective training takes weeks and costs thousands of pounds to do properly. The PeopleMaps stance is that most people do not want to spend a great deal of time and money on training that, when completed, accredits the individual undertaking the training in its use, not the company.
Peoplemaps provides online training, however, not in interpretation, It is in the use and understanding of the system.
Carl Jung Did Not Use Labels
PeopleMaps is a Jungian system. Jung did not create labels when he wrote “Personality Types” in 1921. This was not an oversight, it was deliberate as Jung always emphasised that every individual is unique.
A personality assessment can help us understand each individual and he claimed that its greatest use was as a compass. He also said that he would not for anything be without that compass.
Accuracy and Margins of Error
Any system that measures anything, does so with a margin of error. As any scientist will tell you. Something that we would say is 1 meter is actually 1 meter +/- 0.01mm, depending on the accuracy of the system.
Labels introduce a margin of error that in some cases will be significantly higher than the unit it is measuring. Something akin to 1m +/- 1m, effectively making the system redundant.
When looking at profiling systems it is crucial to understand where the errors sit. All systems have error margins, however, the largest contributor to error is the vagaries of interpretation by the individuals involved. By removing labels and their need for interpretation, PeopleMaps has removed the largest element that affects the accuracy of profiling systems and in doing so, has increased Peoplemaps accuracy.
What If A Candidate Disagrees With Their Personality Report?
It can come as a bit of a surprise if a candidate or a client disagrees with something in their personality report. The initial reaction is often, "the report must be wrong or the system must be broken somewhere.". This is not the case. Will a candidate disagree with...
Are You Falling Into The Recruitment Trap?
Are you in danger of falling into the trap that most recruiters do? This trap costs recruiters billions every year. So what's the trap? The trap is the denying that any of your staff will ever quit. And yet the first three months of the year are when most people quit...
Interview Like A Mind Reader
The ability to read minds would be pretty handy when it comes to interviewing job candidates. Let's face it you are going to have to work with this stranger, every day, for years to come. In some cases, you will spend more time with this person than you do...
