<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peoplemaps.com/2008/02/27/myers-briggs-type-indicator-mbti/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peoplemaps.com/2008/02/27/myers-briggs-type-indicator-mbti/</link>
	<description>The web&#039;s leading publisher of personality reports and applications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 10:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disillusioned with the Forum and MBTI Culture - Page 4 - MBTI Central</title>
		<link>http://www.peoplemaps.com/2008/02/27/myers-briggs-type-indicator-mbti/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Disillusioned with the Forum and MBTI Culture - Page 4 - MBTI Central</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplemaps.com/blogtest/2008/02/27/myers-briggs-type-indicator-mbti/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>[...] it&#039;s far from it.    MBTI is a science. More specifically, it’s facet of psychology. There is controlled research on the subject, not a lot but enough to qualify it as such. What is annoying about current MBTI [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it&#8217;s far from it.    MBTI is a science. More specifically, it’s facet of psychology. There is controlled research on the subject, not a lot but enough to qualify it as such. What is annoying about current MBTI [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

